How Capital Structure Affects Fundraising in SME IPOs: Insights for DRHP Filing

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) form and shape the backbone of the Indian economic system, contributing substantially to GDP and employment. To scale operations, input utilization for entering new markets, or fund enhancements, many SMEs turn to the general public markets via the SME IPO route for SME financing. A vital fact that influences the fulfillment and robust success of these IPOs is the organisation’s capital structure. The capital structure, which defines the optimal mix of debt and equity in an organisation, plays a pivotal role in fundraising and is cautiously scrutinized at some point of the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) filing process. 

However, the success of an SME IPO funding is deeply tied to the company’s capital structure and performance of how stable and sustained it is for future further potential for growth, and that plays a pivotal stance in influencing investor confidence, regulatory compliance, and overall valuation. 

This article delves into how efficient capital structure affects fundraising in SME IPOs, the significance of disclosures in the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP), and the major impact and considerations required in optimizing their capital structure for IPO readiness. 

Understanding Capital Structure

The capital structure is basically an organisation's economic framework, comprising debt (loans, bonds) and equity (shares, retained earnings). A balanced structure ensures appropriate balance that makes financial stability and lowers risks and challenges, at the same time with an unbalanced one (either too much debt or equity) can deter investors or result in a surge of cost of capital. 

The Components of Capital Structure constitutes Equity financing and  debt financing. Equity financing entails raising capital via the sale of shares, even as debt financing includes borrowing funds to be repaid over the years with interest. The composition of this form and structure extensively affects an organization's financial health, risk profile, and splendor attractiveness to potential  investors.

Impact of Capital Structure on Fundraising in SME IPOs

1. Investor Perception and Confidence 

Investor confidence is tied and originally associated with the fact that how balanced and strategically planned a business enterprise’s capital structure looks like. Companies with excessive debt (high debt-to-equity ratios) frequently face skepticism, as they would confront many struggles to manage interest payments for the adverse times of uncertainties such as economic downturns. 

Generally , companies with debt-to-equity ratios above 2:1 are much less likely to attract institutional investors at the time of an IPO. Conversely, on the alternate side companies with lower debt ratios appear more solid, stable and steady, attracting a broader pool of investors. During the DRHP filing, transparent disclosure of the capital structure permits investors to evaluate the potential risks and returns effectively.

 

      2.    Cost Of Capital  

The capital structure directly impacts the cost of capital. Debt financing, while providing tax advantages because of interest deductibility, increases financial leverage and obligations. Excessive reliance on debt can strengthen financial distress costs, adversely affecting the company's valuation at some stage in an IPO. Debt financing, whilst cheaper, increases the financial burden if sales  revenues vary or fluctuates.

Equity financing, although diluting possession and ownership, does not impose obligatory reimbursement repayment obligations, probably leading to a more favorable assessment within the DRHP. For SMEs filing a DRHP, putting a stability between debt and equity is essential to keeping manageable costs while strategies to remain attractive to investors. 

According to the BSE SME performance, firms with a lower debt-to-equity ratio below the 1.5:1 have achieved 20% better valuations during their IPOs as compared to peers with higher leverage. 

      3. Valuation & Pricing

A sound capital structure enhances an organization's valuation. Investors often tend to evaluate a firm’s potential to generate sufficient profits relative to its debt obligations. On the contrary, a high debt burden can reduce net income and profit margins, negatively impacting valuations. 

An optimal and standard capital structure mix contributes to a favorable organization valuation. A balanced mix of debt and equity shows sturdy financial health and growth potential that would attract investors. The DRHP must articulate how the current capital structure supports the organisation's strategic objectives and long-term plans, providing a comprehensive view of its valuation prospects.

     4.   Regulatory Compliance and Transparency  

SEBI requires SME issuers to adhere to the norms and provide detailed information and proper disclosure of required statements or documents regarding their capital structure in the DRHP, inclusive of outstanding convertible securities and dilution. 

​

Recent Regulation: SEBI’s 2024 norms mandate agencies to convert any outstanding convertible instruments before IPO filings to offer clarity on ownership patterns. A transparent disclosure not just meets regulatory requirements however additionally builds credibility amongst investors.  

SMEs must align their capital structure with SEBI rules to keep away from delays in approval. This consists of clear disclosures about the purpose of fundraising and detailed factors of any risks associated with the capital structure. 

    5. Compliance with SEBI Regulations

​

Regulatory requirements under SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, mandate detailed disclosures of a company’s capital structure in the DRHP. These include:

a)  Shareholding Pattern: Pre-issue and post-issue shareholding must be disclosed to provide transparency about ownership distribution.

b) Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs): Any ESOPs or Employee Stock Option Schemes (ESOS) must be disclosed to clarify employee holdings.

c) Bonus Shares to Promoters: If bonus shares were issued to promoters, this information must also be included.

   6.  Utilization of Funds Raised

The DRHP should clearly articulate how the funds raised can be used—whether to pay off debt, fund growth and expansion, or meet operating working capital requirements. The intended use often influences investor interest. 

Example: In 2023, Vasa Denticity, an SME, allocated 40% of its IPO proceeds to debt repayment. This strategic move helped attract investors looking for low-risk opportunities, resulting in the IPO being oversubscribed around by 3.5 times. 

   7.    Risk Management 

​

High leverage can result in increased financial risk, doubtlessly deterring risk-averse investors. A balanced capital structure mitigates this threat and risk, providing the agency with strong stable investment. The DRHP ought to offer a thorough analysis of the risk elements associated with the capital structure, allowing investors to make informed decisions and make right choices.

Key Considerations for DRHP Filing

​

• Detailed Disclosure: The DRHP ought to provide a detailed breakdown of the capital structure, together with the share of debt and equity, terms of any outstanding convertible securities, and the purpose at the back of the selected structure. This transparency is vital for regulatory compliance and constructing investor confidence and trust.
  
  

• Alignment with Regulatory Guidelines: Adhering to SEBI's guidelines is vital. The DRHP has to mirror compliance with the latest  norms, which includes the requirement for conversion of outstanding convertible securities before filing, to provide clarity on the capital structure.
  
  

• Strategic Justification: The document or DRHP should articulate how the capital structure aligns with the organisation's strategic targets, growth and expansion plans, and long-term sustainability. This narrative facilitates in conveying the enterprise's vision and the role of the capital structure in order to accomplish it.
  
  

• Risk Mitigation Strategies: Outlining strategies to manage risks associated with the capital structure, which includes interest rate fluctuations or refinancing plans, is important. This demonstrates proactive financial management strategy and reassures investors of the organization's preparedness to address potential demanding situations.

Conclusion

The capital structure is not simply a financial metric—it is a strategic device or tool we can say that affects an SME’s potential to raise funds, appeal to investors, and attain long-term achievement. A properly-planned capital structure balances risks and growth or significant surge to ensure financial stability whilst appealing to an extensive range of investors. 

During the DRHP filing system, SMEs must be aware of obvious transparent disclosures, strategic plans, and regulatory compliance. By optimizing their capital structure and definitely articulating its alignment with growth objectives, SMEs can maximize the potential of SME financing, securing the funds needed to scale and thrive in competitive markets.